Showing posts with label Culture. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Culture. Show all posts

Monday, March 17, 2008

論四大壓抑

論四大壓抑 (星島)
03月 17日 星期一 06:30AM

身在海外時,較易比較華人和洋人,一個久留心中揮之不去的印象是:洋人遠較華人快樂;華人之中,移民的第二代、第三代又要比父母快樂些。多番看而思之後,初步結論是:中國人,尤其是較傳統的中國人,深受四種壓抑煎熬,快樂不起來。


  文化的力量是無遠弗屆的,遠涉重洋的中國人也受傳統價值的約制。核心的中國價值圍繞家庭,先要家人好,自己才滿足,所以我們要快樂,要比外國人困難好幾倍。


  道德抑制的力量最大,尤其在性方面。本來在傳統社會,男人的荒淫和婦人的壓制是兩個極端,但男人是在外荒淫,一回到家,立刻拘謹起來,同樣受習俗的擺布。也許中國人把性的原始慾望轉移到口舌之慾,令飲食文化大放異彩吧。但從現代心理學的觀點,性事之樂是無可替代的。


  人是社會的動物,中國人尤其如是。儘管遠赴異國,親友減少,但人情世故,未曾或忘。有社交圈就有面子問題,而這可把人弄得很累,想快活也沒有心情。


  經濟壓抑也許中不如外,因從客觀標準衡量,華人的平均收入及財富高於老外。但壓抑是種心態,也是一種杞憂,學術概念叫做貧窮文化。有此文化的人,富起來並不改變貧窮行為,因未放棄貧窮心態。常心感不足,害怕匱乏,因此終日惶惶恐恐。加上華人又精打細算,結果是弄得生活非常緊張,心情更與快樂絕緣了。


  也許是中國人能喜樂不形於色,故表面較多愁容吧。但如果上述的觀察接近真實的話,則追求快樂,也是我們向西方學習的項目了。
  (乘風遊 劉創楚)

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

I'm really pissed when I watch this

Do the Chinese Singaporean guys know at least how to respect the uncle? Do they have anything better to do?
P.S. Those guys are certainly not those Chinese from Mainland China, you can tell from their Singlish.

Saturday, October 13, 2007

Brown Eye Blue Eye

This is a nice program which talks about discrimination. I highly recommend to all of you.
I know people will never understand the impact of discrimination until once they being discriminated against. I do hope by watching this program, all of us can think about ourselves, think about how we generalize people by their appearances, races... etc.

This program is about an Iowa schoolteacher who, the day after Martin Luther King Jr. was murdered in 1968, gave her third-grade students a first-hand experience in the meaning of discrimination. This is the story of what she taught the children, and the impact that lesson had on their lives.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/divided/etc/view.html

Chapter 1 The Daring Lesson
Jane Elliott divides her 3rd graders into blue and brown-eyed groups. She tells the blue-eyes they are "the better people in this room," gives them privileges and comments on their superiority all day. The brown eyes must wear collars.

Chapter 2 Day Two
Today, roles are reversed. Elliott says she lied and that "the truth is that brown-eyed people are better than blue-eyed people." On this day the brown eyes score higher on a test compared to the previous day when they were "inferior."

Chapter 3 14 Years Later...
At a special reunion in 1984, Elliott's former students watch the original 1970 film of themselves as 3rd graders and talk about the effect her lesson has had on their lives.

Chapter 4 Teaching It to Adults
Jane Elliott is hired to give her "brown eyes-blue eyes" lesson to employees of Iowa's Corrections Department. She quickly succeeds in confusing, angering and upsetting them.

Chapter 5 How the Adults Reacted
Elliott continues to demean and antagonize the "inferior" blue-eyed employees and some strike back. Later, during their debriefing, all the employees analyze what happened to them.

Thursday, September 13, 2007

"friends"

Was doing my readings for Intercultural Communication and felt a bit shocked when I read something about "friend" from an article.

Being exposed to different cultures for these years, I do understand that people from different cultures see things in very different ways. And I always agree that "words have no meanings, people do". That means a particular word may have very different meanings to different individuals, or if that individual doesn't speak that language, that word will have no meaning to him/her at all. This is what makes communication and especially intercultural communication so complicated.

All these years overseas, I've been observing how people from different cultures behave differently. How do they communicate, how do they greet, how do they organise projects, how do they treat their lovers, how to they behave in class, how to they chat in public, how do they queue in lines... etc.. However, I've never thought about how they view "friendship" differently.

Until I read this tonight:

American friendship differs from that found in many parts of the world, where an individual may have few friends but is likely to have a total, rather than a selective, commitment to them. Individuals may be disinclined to share friends with other friends, since both the quality of friendship and the number of friends are considered limited and hence not to be squandered.
*quoted from Cultural Assumptions and Values by Edward C. Stewart, Jack Danielian, & Robert J. Foster


I always try to be objective when I encounter people from other culture. But after I read this, I feel that I'm still assuming lots of my own values as others' value. This is very dangerous.

As for friendships, in my culture, we have limited friends and we do have total commitment to them (at least I do). I always assume that all others have the same value! And when my foriegn friends told me he/she "value our friendship", I do take it quite seriously. But now I may have to re-value what they said again.

Lucky enough though, as I am from a culture that will only make limited number of friends, I've only made very very few friends during these years overseas.

But let me clarify, when I say "friend" here, I do mean "good friends" that you can share your feelings with, not those you just say hi and bye everytime you meet. I do have lots of those type of friends. =P

But yet, I'm pretty sad after realising this. Now I'm not quite sure about the "friendship" with some particular friends. Even if a particular friend told me that he/she "value our friendship", how can I know what is the definition of "value" in his/her mind? We might have a totally different view on just this simple sentence.

Am I thinking too much again?

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Culture day?

Today I got exposed to quite a numbers of different culture in just one afternoon. The Marketing S.E. Asia's Heritage lecture was held in the NUS Museum. The lecturer and a staff from the museum shown us some art works by local and S.E. Aisan artists, this is the first time I've heard of the Nanyang Style of paintings, quite interesting.

The most interesting thing to me is that I've got to see some Chinese ceramic. When I first saw them, I felt quite weird as they look a bit different to what I've seen before in other places. They are similar, but different in details like the things they draw on the ceramic and even the words they wrote on them. Just when I was wondering, the lecturer suddenly said that he and some other scholars suspects that there were actually some ceramic made only for export purpose and those in the museum today could be part of them. They think that the Chinese might have made different ceramic for export and for local use. But studies still have to be done to proof it. At that moment, all my wonders were gone! I truely think that those we saw today were made for export purpose and they were marketed to the S.E. Asians. You can really tell from the type of flowers and fish and even the chinese charaters they painted on the ceramics.

Although I don't really know what is the relationship between the visit to the museum and our course.. I did enjoy the trip and I will be visiting the museum again soon.

After the visit, my friend in the class asked me to go and watch a film together with other friends. It was a German movie called "Run Lola Run" (original German title Lola rennt). This is my first time watching a German movie. The 76-min movie was all about the 3 different scenrios happened when Lola needs to find 100,000 Deutsche Marks for his boyfriend Manni within 20 mins. All 3 scenrios have different endings and lead you to think about life. Oh, and the German friends we met at the movie are also very friendly.

Went to have burger king for dinner with 2 friends from HK after movie, finally I got to hear someone from my own place telling my about the uni life there! Yes, I know nothing about the life in university in my own place at all!! What a shame!!

Hopefully tomorrow's weather will be fine, coz I wanna go to the Army Open House to do some shooting!

And I really wish I didn't need to submit my essay next Monday, coz my friends are going to Bintan this weekend and I couldn't go with them!! =(

Wednesday, August 22, 2007

Who am I?

This is probably the question that I've been wondering all these years. But it bothers me much more by the time I went overseas.

It was not so serious when I was in Australia. When I had to introduce myself, I simply said "I'm from Hong Kong." But it gets more complicated now when I'm coming here to Singapore for exchange from Australia as an international student from Hong Kong.

When I introduce myself here, I always have problems.

If I say "I'm from Hong Kong." People think I'm a exchange student from one of the universities in Hong Kong. If I say "I'm from Australia", then they think I am an emigrant.

So I've to tell people a "story" everytime I introduce myself. Actually it's ok, I just have to say a few more words to explain and just have to get used to the gaze and weird comments since most of them think I've made the stupidest decision in the world. haha.. (I don't think so though, if I have to choose again, I will also come to SG)

Sometimes I wanted to say "I'm a Chinese" but no one will agree with me, not the people in Australia, and not the people in Singapore. I understand that people take "Chinese" as the mainlanders, but we never have a word for the people in HK, we can't use Hong Kongers, we can't use Hong Kong people. So if I'm not a Chinese, who am I?

This problem only occurs when I speak in English, since in Chinese, we simply add "people" after the name of the place/country to describe the people there. So literately "Japan people" (日本人 ri ben ren)= Japanese, "China people" (中國人 zhong guo ren) = Chinese. By the way, this is one of the reasons why Chinese-speaking people have difficulties in learning some languages like English, Chinese is an isolating language (almost every words consists of a morpheme) while English is a polysynthetic language (words tend to have several morpheme).

Back to the topic... who am I? I never know how to answer this. Hong Kong was a British colony until 1997. Before 1997, many of us always struggled when we were asked to fill in forms with a fill called "Nationality". Since we didn't know what we were. People filled in so many different answers in that particular field: Hong Kong (which is NEVER a country), Britain, England, British, Chinese, China, Guangdong, Shanghai (place of their origins).. etc.. I think people in other countries/places will never understand this kind of confusion!!

Now, China has already taken over HK for 10 years. We are still struggling with that "Nationality" field. Of course it's much better than 10 years ago, people nowadays would just fill in either Hong Kong (again, NOT a country..), China, Hong Kong China, or HKSAR.

Till now, I've just talked about the confusion on my "nationality".. there are so many other things that I DON'T KNOW about myself. E.g. traditions, culture... etc. Should I take Chinese traditions as my own traditions? Should I take Chinese culture as my own culture? Or should I separate Hong Kong as an individual place?

I'm even more confused after the Intercultural Communication lecture this evening. The lecturer asked us to do a little exercise during the class. I strongly recommend you try to do it too as it will definitely makes you think about yourself and understand yourself more.

1. Think of a title (a few words) of your culture. (i.e. If you are asked to introduce yourself, what would you say if you are not allowed to say your name?) (To my understanding, "your culture" can be the culture you think you belong to, or just yourself)

Example from my lecturer: South Africa
(Since she is from South Africa, and that's what she wants people know)

2. Think of 3 different words to describe your culture.

Example from my lecturer: Sunday, music, lunch (not sure about if the last one is the one she said)
Why these 3 words? She told us about something happens every Sunday in her family back in South Africa which is related to music and lunch. A very unique story/behaviour that you seldom heard of from other people/culture.

So how did you go?
Me? I didn't even write my title!!
I was so lost.

Later tonight the lecturer sent an email to all international students in the class and asked if we are willing to help for a demonstration or something in the coming lecture. She asked us to tell her "your country and your culture" and she will try to select people from different culture.

ok.. my country.. China?.. HK??.. my culture... do I have one???
so.. I replied her will my "story" and told her that I know nothing about my culture and myself..

Later on I got her reply, she said I'm one of those people who have been exposed to many different culture that I'm used to different cultural settings. And this is "an interesting phenomenon that we see occurring in the world today where people do not have very specific characteristics that they feel they can identify with"

This is very true to me.. and I guess this can be used to "describe" myself...

But this is not the end of my struggles though..
even when I think of the culture of Hong Kong, the Chinese culture, the Indian culture.. etc.. I also have many doubts.. mainly related to the diffusion by American culture.

Will talk about this later.


Tuesday, August 21, 2007

McDonald's: Sales in Europe are ahead of those in the US

Gonna talk about this, but I've already taken some pills, need to go to bed now..will write another entry tomorrow when I have time.. come back again later if you are interested.

For McDonald's, a European redesign starts to pay off
By Julia Werdigier August 17, 2007
International Herald Tribune

LONDON: Taking a respite from an afternoon of shopping, Ita Clift sipped a cappuccino at a McDonald's on Edgeware Road, in northwest London. Though she said she rarely set foot in one of the many branches of the fast-food chain in London, Clift said she dropped in to this one for a quick boost of energy because the restaurant "looked so nice and sophisticated."
Sophisticated? McDonald's?


The Golden Arches are going upscale in Europe - and if you haven't seen a refurbished McDonald's yet, chances are you will see one by the end of this year. Aiming to create a more relaxed, restaurantlike experience in a sophisticated atmosphere, McDonald's is replacing bolted-down, plastic, yellow and white "furniture" with lime-green designer chairs and dark leather upholstery. It is the restaurant chain's biggest revamp in more than 20 years, and, together with its franchisees, it plans to spend more than €600 million, or $806.6 million, remodeling 1,280 of its European restaurants by the end of this year.

McDonald's is also introducing more healthful foods and items that cater to regional tastes, like café lattes. Hoping to attract young adults and professionals, in addition to its core customer base of moms and kids, the chain is also adding amenities like Internet access and rental iPods.

So far, the changes appear to be paying off. Sales in Europe are ahead of those in the United States. In the first half of this year, combined sales at Europe's 6,400 restaurants rose 15 percent to $4.1 billion, compared to a 6 percent increase in America, where McDonald's has 13,800 restaurants and sales were $3.9 billion. The strength of European currencies helped, but even without the lagging U.S. dollar, European revenue is rising faster in real terms than revenue in the United States.


"McDonald's is doing a great job in Europe, which has become an enormously important market for them," said Larry Miller, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets in New York.

The chain now serves over 10 million customers a day in Europe, which contributes 36 percent to the company's operating income, making it the chain's second most profitable region after the United States.

The remodeling is also catching on in America, where McDonald's renovated about 6,000 of its restaurants. For now, the revamp is not spreading to Asia, where business is growing fast - sales are up 11 percent in the second quarter - but revenues are still a fraction of those in Europe and America ($852 million for the quarter that ended June 30).

In some ways the changes are moderate; in others, dramatic. McDonald's kept its trademark golden arches logo in Europe but got rid of the red accompanying it. Instead, restaurants feature a warm burgundy color. The pointy roofs are being phased out and replaced by simple olive green facades, and the bright neon lights in the restaurants were dimmed. French fries and cheeseburgers remain the best-selling items.

The original impetus for the makeover was a European sales slump in the late 1990s, brought on by concerns about obesity and European annoyance at unappealing décor and grumpy McDonald's staff. But the ideas for how to change came from Denis Hennequin, president of McDonald's Europe, the first non-American in that role.

As head of McDonald's restaurants in his native France in the late 1990s, Hennequin had searched for ways to make fast food more appealing to a nation that preferred slow-simmered cassoulets and likes to savor a meal.

"To make McDonald's and a Big Mac work in the country of slow food, we felt we had to pay more attention to space and showcasing," he said, seated in front of zebra print wallpaper in one of the remodeled London restaurants.

He was right. After refurbishment, on average, sales increased 4.5 percent at the upgraded restaurants in France. The new outlets were so successful that two years ago Hennequin was asked to do the same for the rest of Europe.

Some analysts say the new design works better in Europe than in the United States, where a majority of McDonald's customers prefer to eat in their cars or take their food home. "And they won't change their habits," said David Kolpak, an investment manager at Victory Capital Management in Cleveland, Ohio, who owns McDonald's shares in his portfolio.

But now the success of Hennequin's Europewide makeover comes with challenges of its own: How much can you upgrade its image before McDonald's isn't McDonald's?

"If you stretch the brand too much, it can snap," said Dean Crutchfield, director of marketing at Wolff Olins, a brand consultancy in New York.

Hennequin said he did not have a choice. "Re-imaging is essential in the competitive world of retail," he said. "We need to avoid aging faster than our customers." To do that he instructed the design studio he had set up in Paris to come up with nine different formats. Franchised restaurants, which account for about 64 percent of all European outlets, can then choose the design most appropriate for their location and clientele. The designs range from "purely simple," with minimalist decors in neutral colors, to "Qualité," featuring large pictures of lettuce and tomatoes and gleaming stainless steel kitchen utensils like meat grinders.

"The new ones are much more comfortable, less crammed and we love those chairs," said Shane Bogela, 16, referring to the redesigned stores and the "egg" chairs, designed by the Danish architect Arne Jacobsen, at a McDonald's in London.

A separate food factory in Munich is trying to come up with new menus for the different tastes in the 41 European countries, including Russia, in which McDonald's operates - a continuation of a process started in the 1980s, when the company started to offer beer in its German restaurants. In England, McDonald's has started to serve porridge for breakfast; in Portugal it offers soup; and in France, "cheese saga" - burgers with French cheeses.

Paying attention to local tastes has also helped McDonald's overcome some of the cultural hurdles it faced in Europe as a large American fast-food chain. "The problem in Europe," said Kolpak, of Victory Capital, "was the perception that any large U.S. brand has, which is bringing the American way of eating and marketing and invading the local culture."

While head of France, Hennequin experienced opposition to American corporations firsthand in 1999 when Jose Bové, the outspoken leader of a French farmer's union, organized a bulldozing of a McDonald's restaurant to protest the spread of American "hegemony." Hennequin reacted with a large advertising campaign promoting the American chain's use of local produce and its creation of local jobs.

While palates differ from country to country, design is more universal, Hennequin said. He admires strong brands that reinvent themselves to become more fashionable and appealing, like the Mini Cooper. In France he hired the same advertising agency as Apple.

"We would like to stay true to our roots," Hennequin said, "while moving forward."